The European Union was built on Subterfuge, Lies and More Lies

Every so often, only a very few times in a lifetime, something comes along that not only rocks your boat, it rattles the very foundation of your whole view on life.

This is about one such piece of new knowledge.

The European Union is considered by many to be a misbegotten entity that should have died at birth. Instead it was nurtured, and allowed to grow into the monstrosity we see today. It was never going to be a freedom loving institution, given that all decisions were made in secret, the electorate lied to at every occasion and of course totally ignored when they were allowed to express any views. Worse still, it was based on the old world ideals of failed socialism, inherently corrupt, it brought together the lowest common denominator of Man's potential and proceeded to not liberate it but squash it flat.

That's where we are now, but along the way, it is now clear that the three Major UK political parties, along with the BBC and other media, collaborated in a pact of silence to stop everyone learning what was happening in the EU until we had literally signed away our nationhood.

A political elite has for some time manipulated the electoral system to deprive the people of true democratic representation by constructing a party political system that has allowed, indeed encouraged, acts of treason to have been committed.

http://www.acasefortreason.org.uk/
This collaboration to withhold information and to very effectively lie about the consequences of EU membership, was it appears, agreed during the time of the Heath government in 1971.

http://www.bbc5.tv/eyeplayer/video/case-treason

Much of this is not news, but the evidence does go some way to explaining how the pact of silence came into being. A pact so powerful that the agreement amongst party leaders to perpetuate it has lasted for 40 years. However, the “WHY” was missing – the reason behind the decision to get into the EU, at that particular time.

It's common knowledge that the EU was allegedly formed to stop wars, and there is a degree of understanding, looking at Heath's background, that this could have been a driving force for him. However the formation of the EU was not done for trade or to prevent wars, there was yet another element at work here, manipulating and coercing.

A recent disclosure of previously CLASSIFIED American government documents provides more than a hint at the missing element:

• A memorandum, dated July 26, 1950, gives instructions for a campaign to promote a fully fledged European parliament, signed by Gen William J Donovan, head of the American wartime Office of Strategic Services, precursor of the CIA.




• Washington's main tool for shaping the European agenda was the American Committee for a United Europe, created in 1948.
  
  


• The documents show that this committee financed the European Movement. In 1958, for example, it provided 53.5 per cent of the movement's funds.
  
  


• The committee urged “suppressing debate until the point at which adoption of such proposals would become virtually inescapable".
  
  

US intelligence community ran a campaign in the Fifties and Sixties to build momentum for a united Europe. It funded and directed the European federalist movement.The documents confirm suspicions voiced at the time that America was working aggressively behind the scenes to push Britain into a European state.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/1356047/Euro-federalists-financed-by-US-spy-chiefs.html

The motivation behind the American intent to interfere in European politics can only be guessed at, but over time, the USA has been responsible for setting up puppet administrations, funding terrorist groups around the world, and generally playing World Policeman when they had neither the competence nor the best interests of anybody but themselves at heart.

One only has to look at the state of the world now to see what an awful mess has been made of “peace” efforts in the past to also see that the EU is yet another failed American attempt at moulding the world to their perceived image.

So, for their own reasons the USA was instructing on the formation of a new Europe, and it was also clear that they wanted Britain to be a part of it, but Britain was dragging its heels, perhaps recalling Churchill's words on being a composite part of Europe.

“We are with Europe, but not of it”

“We are linked- but not combined”

“We are interested and associated but not absorbed”.

Or read the Zurich speech. Yes, he calls for a United Europe. He also says that Britain and her Commonwealth would be separate from it.

A united Europe was not just an American idea of course, but the great man made it clear that the UK would not join it.
Just what happened to change that intention?

It would be possible to make up all kinds of theories, but perhaps its better to start with two known facts and extrapolate from there:

1. America wanted Britain to join the EU(EEC as it was then called)

2. Strikes and an incompetent Labour administration had combined to bankrupt the country.

It's not hard to imagine America putting pressure on the Heath government to join the EU or face total economic ruin. America was strong enough to do that then, having become very rich as a result of World War two. Without financial support for the Pound, Heath would have had few options open to him, and would have been forced, coerced even, to obey the diktat.

The rest is history, but the complete saga of the EU is still not completely known, for so much was done behind closed doors, but more importantly, nobody in the know has ever had the guts to come out and speak the truth about it, and that is a shameful thing.

The whole story of the EU is that of lies built on other lies, built on subterfuge, and now demonstrating what a disaster it has become.

Heartfelt thanks to the interfering Americans, who should really go back to being cowboys – there's still a few red Indians left to slaughter - but seriously, they would do less damage that way.

PM Brown; The Labour Party - The Barbarians of our age

The media are still putting the spin of respectability on a government that should have fallen on its sword long since. We still hear incredible praise from otherwise intelligent people, attempting to persuade us that Brown is a statesman, has stature, and will work a miracle, yet.

Brown himself tells us he want to go on working to complete the job.


Heavens above ... Hasn't this man done enough already?

As for his abilities, I've only noticed the negative ones, like his proficency at lies and spin, and you will notice none of the people that praise him actually come forth with any strengths that would make a difference now. They know very well he hasn't any.

It is without doubt that Brown, Blair and the rest of the tricksters in the labour government are 120% responsible for the mess we are in now. Anybody that doubts that shouldn't be surprised if they are classed in the same category as the mentally challenged that wander the streets in a daze.

Yet, what is it that Brown wants to get on with.... Is it anything we the public have asked for?

The answer is a resounding "NO", but Brown out of touch as ever, has worked out that he needs to say something to quell the anger over MP's ripping us off with expenses. So, what does he propose - two examples of his perverted thinking:

1. He wants to move the UK over to PR - a proportional representation system of voting. Now, can anybody explain why this would improve accountability of MP's - the short answer is that it would not. Now we have an MP representing a specific area. With PR, you will have a lot more MP's representing a larger area........... So try voting YOUR MP out at the next election. It won't happen because the party chooses the candidates, and your vote counts for the whole party in your area.

2. He wants to complete the changes to the House of Lords This is of course the biggest joke yet. Labour have already done so much damage to democracy by destroying the effectiveness of the HoL's, and now Brown wants to take it further by having the upper house elected like the Commons is. Do we really want this - a duplicate of the Commons? It won't help in the slightest, but it's one of Labours gripes. They have never understood the function of the HoL's, and through spite and ignorance, they would destroy it.

Do you ever get the feeling we are all in a daze. All of these insane things are occurring, we have a government that has destroyed the country, and yet the media talk in terms of a few local difficulties. The media is as responsible as any inept Labour minister, for they have supported them, given them credence, but worst of all, they have perpetuated their insane spin and lies until few really understand the gravity of our situation.

Over and above this we have a government that will not accept responsibility for the chaos they have caused, and lack any moral content. A PM that cared anything for his country would have gone to the country by now, but this one just drags it out, making the damage worse, destroying real hope day by day. Hoping things will improve and some sort of miracle will see his popularity rise again. These are the dreams of a psychotic, but that's for another time.

It really is time for some reality to flourish and show itself, so that we don't all sleep-walk to our doom.

- The incompetence, mismanagement and social indoctrination of this labour government need to be fully exposed and open to view


- The moral and financial state of this country need to be properly examined and corrected.

Openness and honesty are not just spin-words - they are vital to our future, and we desperately to invest in these things, but before that we need to bury the Labour movement in a very large hole. Bankrupting the country is bad enough, but achieving it twice in one lifetime is unforgivable.